Review





Similar Products

95
Miltenyi Biotec viogreen anti ly6c
Viogreen Anti Ly6c, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/viogreen anti ly6c/product/Miltenyi Biotec
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
viogreen anti ly6c - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Miltenyi Biotec anti ly6c pe
Anti Ly6c Pe, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti ly6c pe/product/Miltenyi Biotec
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti ly6c pe - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Bio-Rad rat ly6c antibody
Rat Ly6c Antibody, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rat ly6c antibody/product/Bio-Rad
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat ly6c antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Miltenyi Biotec rate anti mouse ly6c alexa fluor 700
Rate Anti Mouse Ly6c Alexa Fluor 700, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rate anti mouse ly6c alexa fluor 700/product/Miltenyi Biotec
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rate anti mouse ly6c alexa fluor 700 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Miltenyi Biotec anti ly6c apc
Anti Ly6c Apc, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti ly6c apc/product/Miltenyi Biotec
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti ly6c apc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Miltenyi Biotec ly6c
a. Histograms representing statistical comparison of the number (n/ml) of myeloid (left) and lymphocyte (right) immune cells populations from whole blood collected from B16 or MC38-bearing mice treated with anti-PD1, anti-PD-L1or IgG. Data are represented as bars with symbols for individual data points and they are expressed by mean ± SEM, (n=4-5), * p<0.05, ** p <0.01. Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni or Dunn’s correction for multiple comparisons (B16F10-IgG vs B16F10-PD-1 or B16F10-PD-L1 and MC38-IgG vs MC38-PD-1 or MC38-PD-L1 and PBS vs B16F10-IgG or MC38-IgG). b. Schematic timeline of immuno-neutralization of γδ T lymphocytes in B16- and MC38-bearing mice treated with anti-PD-L1 and IgG. B16F10 mice were injected (i.p.) with anti-PD-L1 or IgG on day 2-4-7 and with an anti-TCRγδ on days 4-7. MC38 mice were injected (i.p.) with anti-PD-L1 or IgG on days 6-10-13 and with anti-TCRγδ on days 6-10-13. Depending on the kinetics of tumor growth (B16: D5-D8, MC38: D13-D16), mice behavior was evaluated by means of OFT, NOR, EPM and TST tests, then sacrificed the day after the end of the behavioral session (B16: D9, MC38: D17) and brains, blood and tumors were collected for further analysis. c . Curves of tumoral volumes represented as mean ± SEM (n = 10) of B16-IgG/B16-PD-L1 and MC38-IgG/MC38-PD-L1 mice receiving or not anti-TCRγδ at indicated time points. Statistical comparison was performed by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni test for multiple comparisons (MC38 IgG vs. MC38 IgG-TCRγδ, MC38 IgG vs. MC38 PD-L1, MC38 IgG vs. MC38 PD-L1-TCRγδ, MC38 IgG-TCRγδ vs. MC38 PD-L1, MC38 IgG-TCRγδ vs. MC38 PD-L1-TCRγδ, MC38 PD-L1 vs. MC38 PD-L1-TCRγδ, *** p<0.001 (IgG vs PD-L1), $ p<0.05, $$$ p<0.001 (IgG vs IgG-TCRγδ). d. Impact of anti-TCRγδ treatment on the proportion of circulating CD3 + TCRγδ + lymphocytes in blood of B16- and MC38-bearing mice treated with anti-PD-L1 and IgG. Statistical comparison was performed by one-way ANOVA test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (B16F10 IgG vs. B16F10 PD-L1, B16F10 IgG-TCRγδ vs. B16F10 PD-L1-TCRγδ, B16F10 PD-L1 vs B16F10 PD-L1-TCRγδ, B16F10 IgG vs B16F10 IgG-TCRγδ, MC38 IgG vs. MC38 PD-L1, MC38 IgG-TCRγδ vs. MC38 PDL1-TCRγδ, MC38 PD-L1 vs. MC38 PD-L1-TCRγδ, MC38 IgG vs. MC38 IgG-TCRγδ). Data are represented as bars with symbols for individual data points and they are expressed by mean ± SEM, * p<0.05, ** p<0.01. e. Impact of anti-TCRγδ treatment on anxiety-like behaviors in EPM and on short-term memory in NORT in B16- and MC38-bearing mice treated with anti-PD-L1 and IgG. Statistical analyses were performed (n=10) using one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis with Bonferroni or Dunn’s correction for multiple comparisons (B16F10 IgG vs. B16F10 PD-L1, B16F10 IgG-TCRγδ vs. B16F10 PD-L1-TCRγδ, B16F10 PD-L1 vs B16F10 PD-L1-TCRγδ, B16F10 IgG vs B16F10 IgG-TCRγδ, MC38 IgG vs. MC38 PD-L1, MC38 IgG-TCRγδ vs. MC38 PDL1-TCRγδ, MC38 PD-L1 vs. MC38 PD-L1-TCRγδ, MC38 IgG vs. MC38 IgG-TCRγδ). Data are represented as violin plot with symbols for individual data points and they are expressed by mean ± SEM, * p<0.05, ** p <0.01. CD: cluster of differentiation, CD11b: integrin alpha M subunit, CD11c: complement component 3 receptor 4 subunit, CD206: cluster of differentiation 206, CD45: leukocyte common antigen, D: day, DAPI: 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindol, EPM: elevated plus maze, FoxP3: forkhead box P3, IgG: immunoglobulin G, i.p.: intraperitoneal injection, <t>Ly6C:</t> lymphocyte antigen 6 family member C, Ly6G: lymphocyte antigen 6 family member G, MHCII: major histocompatibility complex 2, M-MDSC: monocytic-derived myeloid derived suppressor cells, NeuN: neuronal nuclei antigen, NK: natural killer, NOR: novel object recognition test, OFT: open field test, PD-1: programmed cell death 1, PD-L1: programmed cell death ligand 1, PMN-MDSC: polymorphonuclear myeloid derived suppressor cells, ROR: Retinoic acid-related Orphan Receptors, SSC: side scattering gating, TCR: T cell receptor, TST: tail suspension test.
Ly6c, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ly6c/product/Miltenyi Biotec
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ly6c - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


a. Histograms representing statistical comparison of the number (n/ml) of myeloid (left) and lymphocyte (right) immune cells populations from whole blood collected from B16 or MC38-bearing mice treated with anti-PD1, anti-PD-L1or IgG. Data are represented as bars with symbols for individual data points and they are expressed by mean ± SEM, (n=4-5), * p<0.05, ** p <0.01. Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni or Dunn’s correction for multiple comparisons (B16F10-IgG vs B16F10-PD-1 or B16F10-PD-L1 and MC38-IgG vs MC38-PD-1 or MC38-PD-L1 and PBS vs B16F10-IgG or MC38-IgG). b. Schematic timeline of immuno-neutralization of γδ T lymphocytes in B16- and MC38-bearing mice treated with anti-PD-L1 and IgG. B16F10 mice were injected (i.p.) with anti-PD-L1 or IgG on day 2-4-7 and with an anti-TCRγδ on days 4-7. MC38 mice were injected (i.p.) with anti-PD-L1 or IgG on days 6-10-13 and with anti-TCRγδ on days 6-10-13. Depending on the kinetics of tumor growth (B16: D5-D8, MC38: D13-D16), mice behavior was evaluated by means of OFT, NOR, EPM and TST tests, then sacrificed the day after the end of the behavioral session (B16: D9, MC38: D17) and brains, blood and tumors were collected for further analysis. c . Curves of tumoral volumes represented as mean ± SEM (n = 10) of B16-IgG/B16-PD-L1 and MC38-IgG/MC38-PD-L1 mice receiving or not anti-TCRγδ at indicated time points. Statistical comparison was performed by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni test for multiple comparisons (MC38 IgG vs. MC38 IgG-TCRγδ, MC38 IgG vs. MC38 PD-L1, MC38 IgG vs. MC38 PD-L1-TCRγδ, MC38 IgG-TCRγδ vs. MC38 PD-L1, MC38 IgG-TCRγδ vs. MC38 PD-L1-TCRγδ, MC38 PD-L1 vs. MC38 PD-L1-TCRγδ, *** p<0.001 (IgG vs PD-L1), $ p<0.05, $$$ p<0.001 (IgG vs IgG-TCRγδ). d. Impact of anti-TCRγδ treatment on the proportion of circulating CD3 + TCRγδ + lymphocytes in blood of B16- and MC38-bearing mice treated with anti-PD-L1 and IgG. Statistical comparison was performed by one-way ANOVA test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (B16F10 IgG vs. B16F10 PD-L1, B16F10 IgG-TCRγδ vs. B16F10 PD-L1-TCRγδ, B16F10 PD-L1 vs B16F10 PD-L1-TCRγδ, B16F10 IgG vs B16F10 IgG-TCRγδ, MC38 IgG vs. MC38 PD-L1, MC38 IgG-TCRγδ vs. MC38 PDL1-TCRγδ, MC38 PD-L1 vs. MC38 PD-L1-TCRγδ, MC38 IgG vs. MC38 IgG-TCRγδ). Data are represented as bars with symbols for individual data points and they are expressed by mean ± SEM, * p<0.05, ** p<0.01. e. Impact of anti-TCRγδ treatment on anxiety-like behaviors in EPM and on short-term memory in NORT in B16- and MC38-bearing mice treated with anti-PD-L1 and IgG. Statistical analyses were performed (n=10) using one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis with Bonferroni or Dunn’s correction for multiple comparisons (B16F10 IgG vs. B16F10 PD-L1, B16F10 IgG-TCRγδ vs. B16F10 PD-L1-TCRγδ, B16F10 PD-L1 vs B16F10 PD-L1-TCRγδ, B16F10 IgG vs B16F10 IgG-TCRγδ, MC38 IgG vs. MC38 PD-L1, MC38 IgG-TCRγδ vs. MC38 PDL1-TCRγδ, MC38 PD-L1 vs. MC38 PD-L1-TCRγδ, MC38 IgG vs. MC38 IgG-TCRγδ). Data are represented as violin plot with symbols for individual data points and they are expressed by mean ± SEM, * p<0.05, ** p <0.01. CD: cluster of differentiation, CD11b: integrin alpha M subunit, CD11c: complement component 3 receptor 4 subunit, CD206: cluster of differentiation 206, CD45: leukocyte common antigen, D: day, DAPI: 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindol, EPM: elevated plus maze, FoxP3: forkhead box P3, IgG: immunoglobulin G, i.p.: intraperitoneal injection, Ly6C: lymphocyte antigen 6 family member C, Ly6G: lymphocyte antigen 6 family member G, MHCII: major histocompatibility complex 2, M-MDSC: monocytic-derived myeloid derived suppressor cells, NeuN: neuronal nuclei antigen, NK: natural killer, NOR: novel object recognition test, OFT: open field test, PD-1: programmed cell death 1, PD-L1: programmed cell death ligand 1, PMN-MDSC: polymorphonuclear myeloid derived suppressor cells, ROR: Retinoic acid-related Orphan Receptors, SSC: side scattering gating, TCR: T cell receptor, TST: tail suspension test.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Therapy Triggers Cognitive Deficits and Anxiety-Like Behaviors Through Tumor-Initiated Neuroinflammatory Niches in Male Mice

doi: 10.1101/2025.09.03.673981

Figure Lengend Snippet: a. Histograms representing statistical comparison of the number (n/ml) of myeloid (left) and lymphocyte (right) immune cells populations from whole blood collected from B16 or MC38-bearing mice treated with anti-PD1, anti-PD-L1or IgG. Data are represented as bars with symbols for individual data points and they are expressed by mean ± SEM, (n=4-5), * p<0.05, ** p <0.01. Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni or Dunn’s correction for multiple comparisons (B16F10-IgG vs B16F10-PD-1 or B16F10-PD-L1 and MC38-IgG vs MC38-PD-1 or MC38-PD-L1 and PBS vs B16F10-IgG or MC38-IgG). b. Schematic timeline of immuno-neutralization of γδ T lymphocytes in B16- and MC38-bearing mice treated with anti-PD-L1 and IgG. B16F10 mice were injected (i.p.) with anti-PD-L1 or IgG on day 2-4-7 and with an anti-TCRγδ on days 4-7. MC38 mice were injected (i.p.) with anti-PD-L1 or IgG on days 6-10-13 and with anti-TCRγδ on days 6-10-13. Depending on the kinetics of tumor growth (B16: D5-D8, MC38: D13-D16), mice behavior was evaluated by means of OFT, NOR, EPM and TST tests, then sacrificed the day after the end of the behavioral session (B16: D9, MC38: D17) and brains, blood and tumors were collected for further analysis. c . Curves of tumoral volumes represented as mean ± SEM (n = 10) of B16-IgG/B16-PD-L1 and MC38-IgG/MC38-PD-L1 mice receiving or not anti-TCRγδ at indicated time points. Statistical comparison was performed by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni test for multiple comparisons (MC38 IgG vs. MC38 IgG-TCRγδ, MC38 IgG vs. MC38 PD-L1, MC38 IgG vs. MC38 PD-L1-TCRγδ, MC38 IgG-TCRγδ vs. MC38 PD-L1, MC38 IgG-TCRγδ vs. MC38 PD-L1-TCRγδ, MC38 PD-L1 vs. MC38 PD-L1-TCRγδ, *** p<0.001 (IgG vs PD-L1), $ p<0.05, $$$ p<0.001 (IgG vs IgG-TCRγδ). d. Impact of anti-TCRγδ treatment on the proportion of circulating CD3 + TCRγδ + lymphocytes in blood of B16- and MC38-bearing mice treated with anti-PD-L1 and IgG. Statistical comparison was performed by one-way ANOVA test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (B16F10 IgG vs. B16F10 PD-L1, B16F10 IgG-TCRγδ vs. B16F10 PD-L1-TCRγδ, B16F10 PD-L1 vs B16F10 PD-L1-TCRγδ, B16F10 IgG vs B16F10 IgG-TCRγδ, MC38 IgG vs. MC38 PD-L1, MC38 IgG-TCRγδ vs. MC38 PDL1-TCRγδ, MC38 PD-L1 vs. MC38 PD-L1-TCRγδ, MC38 IgG vs. MC38 IgG-TCRγδ). Data are represented as bars with symbols for individual data points and they are expressed by mean ± SEM, * p<0.05, ** p<0.01. e. Impact of anti-TCRγδ treatment on anxiety-like behaviors in EPM and on short-term memory in NORT in B16- and MC38-bearing mice treated with anti-PD-L1 and IgG. Statistical analyses were performed (n=10) using one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis with Bonferroni or Dunn’s correction for multiple comparisons (B16F10 IgG vs. B16F10 PD-L1, B16F10 IgG-TCRγδ vs. B16F10 PD-L1-TCRγδ, B16F10 PD-L1 vs B16F10 PD-L1-TCRγδ, B16F10 IgG vs B16F10 IgG-TCRγδ, MC38 IgG vs. MC38 PD-L1, MC38 IgG-TCRγδ vs. MC38 PDL1-TCRγδ, MC38 PD-L1 vs. MC38 PD-L1-TCRγδ, MC38 IgG vs. MC38 IgG-TCRγδ). Data are represented as violin plot with symbols for individual data points and they are expressed by mean ± SEM, * p<0.05, ** p <0.01. CD: cluster of differentiation, CD11b: integrin alpha M subunit, CD11c: complement component 3 receptor 4 subunit, CD206: cluster of differentiation 206, CD45: leukocyte common antigen, D: day, DAPI: 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindol, EPM: elevated plus maze, FoxP3: forkhead box P3, IgG: immunoglobulin G, i.p.: intraperitoneal injection, Ly6C: lymphocyte antigen 6 family member C, Ly6G: lymphocyte antigen 6 family member G, MHCII: major histocompatibility complex 2, M-MDSC: monocytic-derived myeloid derived suppressor cells, NeuN: neuronal nuclei antigen, NK: natural killer, NOR: novel object recognition test, OFT: open field test, PD-1: programmed cell death 1, PD-L1: programmed cell death ligand 1, PMN-MDSC: polymorphonuclear myeloid derived suppressor cells, ROR: Retinoic acid-related Orphan Receptors, SSC: side scattering gating, TCR: T cell receptor, TST: tail suspension test.

Article Snippet: The following anti-mouse antibodies were used, with clone, fluorophore, and reference indicated in parenthesis: CD45 (REA737, VioGreen, 130-110-803, Miltenyi Biotec), CD11b (M1/70, FITC, 101206, Biolegend), CD11c (N418, PerCP, 117328, Biolegend), MHCII (M5/114.15.2, BV605, 107639, Biolegend), CD206 (APC, FAB2535A, R&D systems), Ly6G (1A8, BV421, 1238135, Sony Biotechnology), Ly6C (REA796, Vioblue, 130-111-921, Miltenyi Biotec), CD3 (17A2, BV421, 100228, Biolegend), CD4 (REA1211, PE, 130-123-206, Miltenyi Biotec), CD8 (53-6.7, FITC, 11-0081-82, Invitrogen), NK1.1 (PK136, PerCP, 1143630, Sony Biotechnology), CD19 (6D5, AF700, 115527, Biolegend), FoxP3 (MF-14, AF647, 1232040, Sony Biotechnology), RORγt (Q31-378, BV786, BD Biosciences) and TCRγδ (GL3, BV605, 118129, Biolegend).

Techniques: Comparison, Neutralization, Injection, Immunopeptidomics, Derivative Assay, Suspension